VAN HALEN NEWS DESK

Van Halen files suit against Nike

Amazingly, Nike went ahead and mass-produced some shoes that feature the trademarked Van Halen stripes!

From KTLA News:

LOS ANGELES — Guitarist Eddie Van Halen filed a lawsuit against Nike in Los Angeles Friday, alleging the company used the trademarked striped design from his guitar on their new line of “Dunk Lows” tennis shoes.

The Nike shoes feature red, white and black streaks along the midsole.

The suit states that Van Halen received a 2001 copyright for the design on the body of his “Frankenstein” electric guitar.

Court papers allege that Nike infringed on that copyright by using the design on sneakers without “consent, approval or license.”

Van Halen claims Nike is doing “irreparable harm and damage” to his signature design. He is seeking general and punitive damages, all profits arising from the sales of “Dunk Lows” and a permanent injunciton halting production of the Nike shoes.

Van Halen recently launched his own line of striped sneakers under his EVH brand.

This raises the question; what was Nike thinking? It’s obvious that Nike deliberately copied Eddie Van Halen’s distinctive striped design. This seems like a no-brainer lawsuit that should be a open and shut case for Eddie.

Eddie doesn’t even have a choice but to file this lawsuit, since once you trademark something, you must protect your trademark, and the only way to do that is to vigorously patrol for violations and sue on every one you can find. If you don’t defend your trademark, you lose the trademark and it slips into the public domain. Van Halen’s lawyers are doing what they are supposed to do. We wish Eddie the best with this.

Lawyers for Van Halen said they had no comment beyond the filing, preferring, they said, “to try cases in court.”

In a statement provided to Footwear News by a brand spokesperson, Nike said it was aware of the lawsuit but did not believe it to have merit. “Based on the information provided to us, we have not infringed on any rights held by Mr. Van Halen,” it said. “Nike’s Dunk shoe design is not substantially similar to any of the Van Halen designs, and Nike has not referenced the ‘Van Halen’ name or image as part of any marketing campaign or promotional material associated with the shoe.”

We think Nike’s full of it, because whoever designed those shoes at Nike made  them for the same reason that Eddie made his line of Official EVH Brand Signature Striped Sneakers – to appeal to Van Halen fans.

We’ll end this story with some humor from a VH fan:

I cannot believe no one at Nike noticed the slight resemblance of the stripes on those ugly things to Eddie’s guitar.

Nike employee: “Say, Bob. Does something about those black and white stripes acrross a red background seem familiar to you?”

“You know, Larry, I think you’re right. It’s as though I’ve seen them somewhere before.”

“Bah. Probably our imagination. Start production!”

  • Rocko

    I love Nike but Nike should’ve known better not to touch the stripes.

  • satovan

    gotaa find me some dunk lows!

  • http://youtube.com/vhlvr imcrossingover

    I actually saw these a few days ago. The inside of the shoe was striped too.

    But What about the Famous Stars And Straps Shirts with the Famous “F” that was striped? Or the Baker skateboards who used it for pro skaters? What about Hannah Montana with a tour and song named “Best of Both Worlds?”

  • Dan Van Halen

    If it ain’t news about music….it’s Van Halen news.

  • DLR7884

    This is news, that’s for sure–just not the way it was reported. The quote below is opinion and not news:

    “This begs the question; what was Nike thinking? It’s obvious that Nike deliberately copied Eddie Van Halen’s distinctive striped design. This seems like a no-brainer lawsuit that should be a open and shut case for Eddie.
    Eddie doesn’t even have a choice but to file this lawsuit, since once you trademark something, you must protect your trademark, and the only way to do that is to vigorously patrol for violations and sue on every one you can find. If you don’t defend your trademark, you lose the trademark and it slips into the public domain. Van Halen’s lawyers are doing what they are supposed to do. We wish Eddie the best with this.”

    This site has really gone down the crapper. For the last year or so I have literally shook my head at the “news” this site has posted. Also the “humor” posted by a VH fan at the end of the story was not funny at all-why the hell was it included?

    I can deal with regular news being posted. Chickenfoot, merchandise, etc is all news. A 22 year old Hank Williams Jr video, an interview from 1987, and a live clip of the band from 30 years ago is the exact opposite of “news.”

    I think I may actually stop visiting this place for the first time since 1996….you all have run this place into the ground.

  • Z-man

    What a joke!!! Hey Ed back to the music…not the fricking fashion.

  • Kevin Malone

    “What about Hannah Montana with a tour and song named “Best of Both Worlds?””

    FYI: Song and book titles cannot be copyrighted.

    Nike deserves to be sued. Maybe after Eddie wins this suit he will have enough money to become a musician again.

  • TheRealKeith

    So what…anything with the colors red, white , and black and a design or stripes is considered property of Van Halen ? get real. they shouldn’t have allowed a copyright in the first place on something so obscure. Just like he claims to own 5150 ? Sorry, that a police code NOT invented by VH.What’s next, the letters E, V, H, the guitar, the wheel ?

  • Fred Tubbs

    Well, maybe Eddie can get some sneaker money now to rival Sammy’s liquor money.

  • theREALchris

    Actually, RealKeith, I’m pretty sure he does have a copyright on the “E.V.H.” name, as well as the name Wolfgang. I dunno, I can’t remember. And it’s not as obscure as just red, white, and black stripes. This is stupid and technical, I know, but bear with me. If you want to put those color stripes on something, and sell it, you totally can. They just can’t be arranged in the “pattern,” (and I put that in quotes because we all know damn well that each instance of the stripes with Ed is always random) that he has trademarked and identified himself with. Yeah, I know, splitting hairs and all that, but he’s got a valid point with his suit.

  • Vanicionado

    satovan… if you find a pair, let me know where!!

    TheRealKeith… you have a point. I wonder if the people at Kramer have run around the world suing everyone who has copied their Stratocaser design. Can you put a patent on a guitar shape? As for “5150″, Eddie must be burning over that snowboard company. Wonder if he took a stab at them?

    As for the stripes… I noticed in pictures from Cabo Wabo San Lucas that there’s a pole or piece of wall covered in the signature EVH design. Is Sammy going to get sued next?

  • Vanicionado

    DLR7884…

    Dude, I understand, but really… when was VHND touted to rival to CNN or CNBC?? As a Van Halen fan, we’re lucky this site exists!! Have you seen some other bands fan’s sites? Bad, bad, bad!! At least this site averages an update every two days… I’ve seen some sites with actual cyber dust settling on them…

    And I will always say… remember what you paid to get in.

  • Russ Thorn

    I hope Nike wins the lawsuit. Infringement on a logo is one thing, but it’s ridiculous that Ed was even allowed to copyright a red background with RANDOM black and white stripes over it to begin with. Ed should have had to trademark a definitive pattern of the stripes over the red. Giving him full ownership of any black and white stripes over red is ridiculous.

  • Dooley

    Kudos to Russ Thorn…the points he raises will without question be used effectively by Nike’s legal team. Ed is likely to lose this case and look like a fool in the process. Meanwhile, Chickenfoot is getting down to business.

  • Corey

    I just want to comment on what vanicionato said about the cabo wabo. That pillar or pole or whatever it is that has eds stripes on it is there because the club was origionally opened by the entire band, not just sammy. I guess eddie is just obsessed with that design. I’ve even seen a pic of him driving a golf cart all striped up. And to the people who are talking smack about this, how would you feel if you created a design that became synonomous to you and is something that people instantly recognize as yours be just stolen from you and used without permission? I would get pretty upset. I’ll always support eddie, he’s a smart guy and it’s his life so stop being so hard on him. Also, you people need to learn to be patient. Eddie said that sometime in 2010 he will get a new album out and the boys will go on tour. You have to expect things will happen between now and then that aren’t neccisarily about new music. Just give him time.

  • Marvin

    If you wanna have some fun, google “red white black”

    :)

  • Vanicionado

    Corey… I know that Cabo was established when Sammy was in VH, and that even Eddie had a stake in it back then… I’m just surprised that Sammy has kept it there and that Eddie has not asked for him to take it down.

    As for the shoes… I don’t really care who wins the law suit, some poor kid over seas is working hard putting them together and he ain’t getting paid shit!

  • Corey

    Hasn’t that how it’s always been with Nike though. I see your point though, and I agree with you.

  • McGibbs

    Most kids buying “Dunk Lows” probably never heard of VH and never will.

  • Russ Thorn

    McGibbs is right. Anybody who thinks Nike marketed these for VH fans is an idiot.

  • Jor-L5150

    i hate to say it , but ed’s right .

  • DiamondDLR

    1) Nike will win. Sorry Ed, but you don’t own every combination of red/white/black.

    2) When can we get an update on Wolfgang? Shouldn’t his trip to a local Starbucks or the fact that he got a haircut on Thursday be up here by now?

  • Adam

    McGibbs is right about the fact that most young people not being familiar with Ed’s stripes. But the VHND is right about the stripes not being a coincidence. The stripes are exactly like VH’s stripes. Not a coincidence.

  • Joe

    Isn’t it a bit difficult for anyone viewing this website to be truly objective about the Nike shoe design? I can only see one thing when I look at the shoes. I can’t speak for anyone else. If I saw the shoes in a store, I would instantly pick them up and look for an EVH logo, assuming he was involved. That may or may not have been Nike’s intention.

  • DiamondDLR

    Adam says:

    “The stripes are exactly like VH’s stripes.”

    Adam – Funny thing about the word “exactly,” it’s EXACT. :) The stripes are not exactly like the EHV stripes, they don’t even overlap on the shoe design, and even a first year law student dropout will be all over that. Study Ed’s design – all the stripes overlap one another.

    Ed will never win the suit and has no plans to. It’s a calculated move and a good way for him to advertise his own sneakers.

    As others have mentioned, you think ANYONE who isn’t a hardcore VH fan would even give it a second thought? Not in a million years.

    The casual shopper will immediately equate the shoes with Michael “Air” Jordan. The color combo and sneaker design are very similar to the Air Jordans that Nike has produced over the years.

  • pete

    as much as i hate how much stuff they sell these days i’m gonna have to side with eddie on this one,you cant just let people rip you off.

  • Dan

    Ed deserves to win this lawsuit, the design is a trademark no matter how you spin it. If you saw these shoes in the store, what would be your first thought? Marketed for VH fans , who really knows. The random criss cross of the stripes are an indication or subtle hint of what we all relate to Ed’s guitar.That my friends is a trademark.

    Whether it was intentional or not, who cares, Ed deserves to at least have Nike halt production. Anyone who disagrees is wanting to in spite of Ed.

  • ace5150

    Gene Simmons would be proud!!

    Kiss relies solely on the income of it’s trademark. So much so that they no longer have to make new music or for that fact even tour much anymore.

    This sound familiar to anyone?

  • ruben

    Eddie would get more from the royalties of a new record and we would be much happier!

  • pete

    ace5150,normally i would agree with you but in this case eddie is being ripped off and if it was me i would do the same thing.

  • Borch

    Who cares, the shoes are ugly anyway.

  • Matt from Australia

    That’s ebay gold – right there….

  • http://www.myspace.com/pridesettemusic kevin_PrideSette

    Eddie should look into the Famous company…with the “f” logo….they did the same thing!! some hip hop artist owns that clothing line….

  • ringostore

    I would never wear these stripes anyways. Too obsesive and possesive of a certain thing. Everyone will think thats all you play.
    Eddie just blast out some new music and quit worrying so much about litigation. It is just some stripes that you had fun with and you can say you were the first to design.
    Didn’t you give up making a dime off of “Beat it”? And you didn’t care? Come on man, you’ve done well enough.

  • Joe

    Stop worrying about a design and just produce some music.

  • Skutch

    It doesn’t matter whether or not kids buying them have heard of VH or not, Ed’s still got a trademark on the pattern. This might be a bad analogy, but it’s sort of like a recipe. Coca-cola doesn’t have exclusive rights to the ingredients in Coke, but the do have exclusive rights to the formula. Ed isn’t the only one who can use those colors, but when it gets arranged a certain way, it turns into an infringement issue. It’s just a matter of whether the jury/judge will take his side.

  • sean

    At least Chickenfoot’s priorities are: music and fans. Not shoes and lawsuits.

  • esv

    Eddie’s shoes are the coolest thing since Elvis’ blue suede shoes! Nike thinks we’re all a bunch of dumbasses! Sue the fuck out of ‘em!

  • RickieVanWhalen

    This free chickenfoot concert was brought to you by:

    Cabowabo and Mike’s BBQ sauce.

    I believe you Sean.

  • Kirby

    Seriously people – can you imagine a world where NOT EVERYONE is a huge VH fan, and wouldn’t know recognize EVH’s red striped pattern, much less know there was a trademark against it?

    Now, clearly, there is a legal issue as Eddie owns that pattern, and it will most certainly be pulled from shelves (read: get them now), but it’s ridiculous to read lines like, “What was NIKE thinking?”

  • Mark Sachs

    I went out and bought a pair of these Nikes last week at my local Finish Line. They were on display right when you walk into the store with other shoes. It doesn’t appear that Nike is too worried about Ed’s lawsuit which doesn’t surprise me. I think that Nike has a pretty big reputation for arrogance. I asked the salesman about the shoes and if he knew of Ed’s lawsuit. He said that he had heard “something about it” but that they “had not been asked to pull the shoes.”

    Plus, the pattern is similar in color only, as someone posted earlier, the stripes don’t overlap. In my opinion, Eddie doesn’t stand a chance at winning this suit.

  • http://www.nike-kicks.com nike dunk

    they are nuthin to great but ill get a pair or 2 outta the bunch to keep my collection beefing up