<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Van Halen &#8211; Hot or Not?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vhnd.com/2010/01/28/van-halen-hot-or-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vhnd.com/2010/01/28/van-halen-hot-or-not/</link>
	<description>The Latest News &#38; Info about The Mighty Van Halen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 23:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Careyvanhalen</title>
		<link>http://www.vhnd.com/2010/01/28/van-halen-hot-or-not/comment-page-2/#comment-133951</link>
		<dc:creator>Careyvanhalen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 04:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vhnd.com/?p=3107#comment-133951</guid>
		<description>Van Halen with Dave redefined rock music forever. No ballads,just pure Rock n Roll the way it should be done. Sammy turned them into Journey or Foreigner, not that I don&#039;t like those bands, but not near as important, innovative, and special as the first 5 VH albums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Van Halen with Dave redefined rock music forever. No ballads,just pure Rock n Roll the way it should be done. Sammy turned them into Journey or Foreigner, not that I don&#8217;t like those bands, but not near as important, innovative, and special as the first 5 VH albums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.vhnd.com/2010/01/28/van-halen-hot-or-not/comment-page-2/#comment-57108</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vhnd.com/?p=3107#comment-57108</guid>
		<description>Wow, a Sam vs. Dave argument, how original.

Never seen one of these before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, a Sam vs. Dave argument, how original.</p>
<p>Never seen one of these before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.vhnd.com/2010/01/28/van-halen-hot-or-not/comment-page-2/#comment-55500</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 05:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vhnd.com/?p=3107#comment-55500</guid>
		<description>Is that a cutlass I see them driving?  Niiice riiiidddeeeee maaaan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that a cutlass I see them driving?  Niiice riiiidddeeeee maaaan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: halenhagar</title>
		<link>http://www.vhnd.com/2010/01/28/van-halen-hot-or-not/comment-page-2/#comment-55229</link>
		<dc:creator>halenhagar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vhnd.com/?p=3107#comment-55229</guid>
		<description>If it looks like a DUCK, walks like a DUCK, quacks like a DUCK, then it must be a DAVID LEE ROTH fan, not a Van Halen fan.
Stop putting the blame on Sammy. Van Halen had their time in the 70&#039;s-80&#039;s and they had their time in the 80&#039;s and 90&#039;s so what if they are all washed up with Dave now. Van Halen was Great during the 78-96 life span and floundered like a fish out of water after Sammy left the band never to regeain their Popularity, well there was a little spurt whith the new material during the 2004 G.H. and the 3 songs that would have made another #1 with Sammy Hagar and Van Halen, but as usual Eddie blew that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it looks like a DUCK, walks like a DUCK, quacks like a DUCK, then it must be a DAVID LEE ROTH fan, not a Van Halen fan.<br />
Stop putting the blame on Sammy. Van Halen had their time in the 70&#8242;s-80&#8242;s and they had their time in the 80&#8242;s and 90&#8242;s so what if they are all washed up with Dave now. Van Halen was Great during the 78-96 life span and floundered like a fish out of water after Sammy left the band never to regeain their Popularity, well there was a little spurt whith the new material during the 2004 G.H. and the 3 songs that would have made another #1 with Sammy Hagar and Van Halen, but as usual Eddie blew that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andym</title>
		<link>http://www.vhnd.com/2010/01/28/van-halen-hot-or-not/comment-page-2/#comment-55149</link>
		<dc:creator>andym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vhnd.com/?p=3107#comment-55149</guid>
		<description>Duck - when you speak it just sounds like crap coming out.  You make no sense at all.

Phillster - of course they did those songs from &#039;76 - &#039;07 (more like &#039;76 - &#039;84).  They had to...if it was the Women and Children First Tour they obviously did at least 6 or 7 songs from it that album and I&#039;m willing to bet they never played 3 or 4 of those on the 1984 tour.  Speaking of kiddie tables, that&#039;s where you find adolescents like you who STILL refer to mommy jokes as if it&#039;s still something cool to do.  Get a clue pal.  How about you try to skip past the &#039;80s/&#039;90s and maybe join the rest of us in the 2000&#039;s?  Ok?  Maybe before your next attempt at poking fun will mention phrases like &quot;daddy-O&quot; and &quot;make like a tree and split&quot;.

Rich - this doesn&#039;t concern you but since you decided to join in I&#039;ll address you too.  I am a VH fan of any version (except the failed Cherone attempt).  My beef is that I can&#039;t understand how Eddie basically since 1984 has decided to turn his back on the music HE created.  Any other band that has changed lead singers (Boston, Journey, AC/DC, etc) has ALWAYS played the entire catalog.  If anyone is a bitch or &quot;little girl&quot; about this topic it&#039;s Eddie.  How&#039;s that for something to &quot;appreciate&quot;???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duck &#8211; when you speak it just sounds like crap coming out.  You make no sense at all.</p>
<p>Phillster &#8211; of course they did those songs from &#8217;76 &#8211; &#8217;07 (more like &#8217;76 &#8211; &#8217;84).  They had to&#8230;if it was the Women and Children First Tour they obviously did at least 6 or 7 songs from it that album and I&#8217;m willing to bet they never played 3 or 4 of those on the 1984 tour.  Speaking of kiddie tables, that&#8217;s where you find adolescents like you who STILL refer to mommy jokes as if it&#8217;s still something cool to do.  Get a clue pal.  How about you try to skip past the &#8217;80s/&#8217;90s and maybe join the rest of us in the 2000&#8242;s?  Ok?  Maybe before your next attempt at poking fun will mention phrases like &#8220;daddy-O&#8221; and &#8220;make like a tree and split&#8221;.</p>
<p>Rich &#8211; this doesn&#8217;t concern you but since you decided to join in I&#8217;ll address you too.  I am a VH fan of any version (except the failed Cherone attempt).  My beef is that I can&#8217;t understand how Eddie basically since 1984 has decided to turn his back on the music HE created.  Any other band that has changed lead singers (Boston, Journey, AC/DC, etc) has ALWAYS played the entire catalog.  If anyone is a bitch or &#8220;little girl&#8221; about this topic it&#8217;s Eddie.  How&#8217;s that for something to &#8220;appreciate&#8221;???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phillster</title>
		<link>http://www.vhnd.com/2010/01/28/van-halen-hot-or-not/comment-page-2/#comment-55139</link>
		<dc:creator>phillster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vhnd.com/?p=3107#comment-55139</guid>
		<description>he started it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he started it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

