VAN HALEN NEWS DESK

Classic Rock magazine’s Van Halen Buyer’s Guide

With a consummate showman, the guitarist of a generation and some classic tracks, they revolutionized hard rock.
If ever a rock band epitomized the American Dream, it’s Van Halen.

Formed in Pasadena, California in 1974 by four teenage kids from families that had migrated across the Atlantic in the pursuit of a better life, Van Halen were loud, brash, shamelessly ambitious, larger-than-life: classically all-American. And so was their pioneering spirit.

Van Halen revolutionized hard rock music. When the band’s debut album was released in 1978, punk had unsettled rock’s old order; giants such as Zeppelin and Sabbath were on their last legs. But VH had seen the future. “This is the 1980s!” declared singer David Lee Roth, boldly if prematurely. “And this is the new sound – it’s hyper, it’s energy, it’s urgent.”

The key to that new sound was Eddie Van Halen, whose innovative two-handed ‘tapping’ technique made him the most influential guitarist since Jimi Hendrix. But VH wasn’t a one-man show. Eddie’s brother Alex went at his drum kit like a prizefighter. Bassist Michael Anthony underpinned Eddie’s histrionics and provided killer backing vocals that had him rightly described as the band’s “secret weapon”. And then, of course, there was ‘Diamond Dave’, a wisecracking, split-jumping, super-toned blond Adonis, son of second-generation Jewish immigrants, and hard rock’s greatest showman. As Roth stated: “I once heard somebody say to the Van Halens: ‘You guys play the music, the Jew sells it.’ Well, you’re fucking right!”

With Roth as cheerleader, Van Halen were America’s favourite party band, their high-octane turbo-pop songs the soundtrack to the ‘me’ decade. But when Roth left the band in 1985 amid mutual hostility, much of the magic went with him, even if his replacement, Sammy Hagar, was a better singer.
Nevertheless, the new-look ‘Van Hagar’ proved just as successful as the former model, while Roth’s solo career stalled in the 90s.

Hagar lasted 10 years. His successor, former Extreme vocalist Gary Cherone, was out after one album. Hagar returned for a chaotic reunion tour in 2004, and two years later came the announcement that Roth was rejoining the band with, shockingly, Eddie’s 15-year-old son Wolfgang replacing Michael Anthony.

Whatever happens next, Van Halen’s place in the pantheon of classic rock acts is secure. With 56 million albums sold, they are 19th on the list of biggest-selling acts in the US. And at their best (with Roth) Van Halen ruled.

ESSENTIAL: CLASSICS

VAN HALEN
Warner Brothers, 1978

As one of the classic debut albums, this 10-million seller is up there with Zeppelin’s and Sabbath’s and Appetite For Destruction. Van Halen was like a bomb going off. With its short, punchy songs, technical flash, testosterone-charged swagger and sense of daring, it kick-started the 80s two years early. “We were not afraid of defying convention,” said DLR. “Everybody was ascending.”

Eruption was Eddie’s volcanic showpiece. And the orthodox songs were equally explosive, from Runnin’ With The Devil through to frenetic closer On Fire. Classic Rock’s Geoff Barton, then reviewing for Sounds, called the album “senses-shattering”. Van Halen had arrived – with an almighty bang.

1984
Warner Brothers, 1984

The last of the definitive Roth-era albums was also the one that made Van Halen a household name on this side of the Atlantic when its lead single, Jump, hit No.7 on the UK chart. In playing this simple rock song on a keyboard, guitar hero Eddie beat all those airy-fairy synth-pop acts at their own game.

I’ll Wait, the album’s other big pop crossover hit, was also powered by a keyboard riff, but the hard rock crunch of Panama and Hot For Teacher ensured that the band’s hairy fan base wasn’t alienated.

On 1984, Van Halen could do no wrong… But by 1985 Roth was gone, and the band, in whatever guise, would never be as great again.

SUPERIOR: THE ONES THAT HELPED CEMENT THEIR REPUTATION

VAN HALEN II
Warner Brothers, 1979

How do you follow a belter of a debut album? Many have dropped the ball, from Montrose to The Darkness. But Van Halen walked it, banging out their brilliant second album in just six days. It sounds like it, too: fresh, a little loose, fizzing with energy, its air of beer-fuelled spontaneity encapsulated in Roth’s fumbled lyric and giggles on Bottoms Up!

Shrewdly, Van Halen didn’t try to top the fire-power of Van Halen, opting instead for a lighter, more playful vibe, running from the jammed intro to You’re No Good (such chutzpah!) to Roth’s farewell kiss on the closing Beautiful Girls. And in Dance The Night Away they delivered the perfect pop-metal song.

DIVER DOWN
Warner Brothers, 1982

Possibly the laziest album ever made. There are just 18 minutes of original material on Diver Down. But no matter: despite the whiff of contractual obligation, the album is a blast.

Back in the mid-70s, when they were still a bar band named Mammoth, the boys had a repertoire of 300 cover tunes. Diver Down recalls that era with a stinging rendition of The Kinks’ Where Have All The Good Times Gone!, plus covers of Roy Orbison’s (Oh) Pretty Woman, the Tamla Motown classic Dancing In The Street and a jazz number featuring dad Jan Van Halen on clarinet.

The original songs on the album are all great too, especially Secrets, the sweetest thing Van Halen ever recorded.

FAIR WARNING
Warner Brothers, 1981

The cover illustration – details from Canadian artist William Kurelek’s The Maze, portraying scenes of urban madness and violence – was befitting of the most left-field VH album.

Fair Warning is tough, edgy, dark, and in places plain weird. ZZ Top aside, no other mainstream, multi-platinum hard rock band would have dared to record such bizarre tracks as Dirty Movies (a funky porno satire), Sunday Afternoon In The Park (a sinister, new wave-inspired instrumental), and One Foot Out The Door (a punky, half-finished throwaway).
However, the meat of the album lies in two straight-up rock songs: the bruising Mean Street, and Unchained, featuring Eddie’s chunkiest riff.

WOMEN AND CHILDREN FIRST
Warner Brothers, 1980

Van Halen’s third album included a poster of Roth in classic beefcake pose, photographed by the legendary Helmut Newton. Roth was rock’s leading pin-up boy, but VH hadn’t gone soft. The album is a hard rock tour de force, typified by Tora! Tora!.

And The Cradle Will Rock…, is Roth’s homage to teenage drop-outs. Fools and Everybody Wants Some!! are fluid jams built around crushing riffs. Romeo Delight threatens to run right off the rails. The only light relief comes with the drunken sea shanty Could This Be Magic?

Women And Children First is Van Halen’s true cult classic album. In Roth parlance: “Pure fuckin’ rock.”

GOOD: WORTH EXPLORING

5150
Warner Brothers, 1986

For many people, Van Halen just wasn’t Van Halen without Diamond Dave. Eddie saw it differently. “We lost a frontman,” he said, “but we gained a singer.” And with Sammy Hagar on board, the band’s career arc continued upwards.

5150, the first ‘Van Hagar’ album, was also the band’s first US No.1. With trusted producer Ted Templeman having defected to the now solo Roth camp, VH enlisted Foreigner’s Mick Jones to put a fine gloss on what became the album’s three keyboard-driven hit singles: Why Can’t This Be Love, Dreams and Love Walks In.

And yes, Sammy was a better singer than Dave. But 5150 didn’t have the spark of classic VH. And we all knew why.

FOR UNLAWFUL CARNAL KNOWLEDGE
Warner Brothers, 1991

All four studio albums that Van Halen recorded with Sammy Hagar topped the US chart, although the third of them might not have sold so well if it had been titled according to the singer’s wishes. “I wanted to name the album just Fuck,” Hagar said. Instead, they chose something more oblique.

The album – co-produced by an exonerated Ted Templeman – is patchy, but it has three songs as good as any from the Hagar era: Poundcake – heavy, grungy, with Eddie applying an electric drill to his fretboard; Top Of The World – vintage feelgood VH; and the piano-led Right Now – and arguably the best song the band have ever written.

OU812
Warner Brothers, 1988

Having proved with 5150 that there was life after Dave, Van Halen couldn’t resist a little dig at their former singer with the title of their eighth album, a cheeky reference to Roth’s Eat ‘Em And Smile.

OU812 did good business (current US sales: four million), but it’s a hit-and-miss affair. Lacking Dave’s levity, the heavier tracks are all bluster, but a lighter touch on the three hit singles works beautifully. Black And Blue is a funky boogie lit up by Michael Anthony’s doo-wop-influenced vocal harmonies, When It’s Love is a deluxe rock ballad, Finish What Ya Started is a genuine surprise, with Eddie twanging country-funk guitar licks and Hagar croaking soulfully.

AVOID

VAN HALEN III
Warner Brothers, 1998

Even the most partisan of Roth loyalists had to admit that Hagar could sing. What’s more, Hagar had starred on one of the greatest rock records of all time: Montrose’s legendary self-titled debut. But the same could not be said of Sammy’s replacement. Gary Cherone was the wuss who sang in Extreme – wearing a leotard.

Van Halen and Cherone was a disastrous mismatch, and produced just one album – that sold only 500,000 copies, when every other VH album had shifted at least two million. The reason is that Van Halen III stinks like a wet dog. Every song sucks, and Cherone sings them like a drowning man. It’s an album so bad, in fact, that Van Halen have never made another since.

  • VHIII_1998_

    Scar, I noticed you keep defending Happy trails? You are a cornball, I bet you like the Inside off 5150 too?

  • SFP

    This is great and all but if you are a true VH fan you will not avoid VHIII. If you have children you are proud of them all in thier own way. VHIII is still VH and it still has some great music. It may not be like the debut, 1984 or Fair Warning but it is still VH.

  • SCAR

    VHIII _1998_, I love every song from THE MIGHTY VH!!!! Happy Trails!!!

  • arthur_bishop1972

    JK-47…I agree completely about 1984. VH was already a different band when that album was made. In fact, I’d go further and say that the original VH ended (the recordings I mean) with Fair Warning. I like DD, but I see it as a pause before the next ‘incarnation’-something to keep them on the radio with something new, even if it is half covers (and I like the originals on there fwiw).

    To me, 1984 was cool because it sounded so different for VH, yet they made it work with some good tunes (I like ‘I’ll Wait’, but I don’t like ‘Jump’). However, 25+ years later, it sounds weak compared to the first 4 albums-not raw, not brown, and not as cool as it once was imo either. I also think that some people liked it because they thought it was a detour/pitstop into using keyboards and changing the sound, but imo it turned out that they never came back from that turn. Some of you said you like the tone, but to me, each album (particularly after FW) got more smooth sounding (less brown, I guess). Eddie moved further and further away from gritty distortion and rawness and closer and closer to a polished sound. Listen to the evolution of Alex’s drum sound over the records too. He started off rough and raw (live sounding, if you will). By the time 1984 came about, and more later on, his drum sound was tinny, and a lot of the fills he once played were either impossible to hear over the cymbals being so high in the mix or he flat out stopped playing them. To put it bluntly, Eddie and Alex’s sound became digital, as opposed to analog. MA’s bass practically disappeared from the mix over the years, too. WTF is up with that??

    The issue of Dave vs Sammy (for me) comes down to this: Dave was there at the beginning. If 5150 was VH’s FIRST album, and the world had first become acquainted with EVH through that and subsequent albums, what type of legacy would VH have (compared to what is really is)?? I believe that they would be in the upper half of hair bands from that era (if 5150 was the 1st album). Sammy kicked ass with solo stuff like ‘Red’ and some of that other early stuff (‘One Way to Rock’ is cool too imo), but I think that he and VH kind of put out each other’s fires. They both had attitude and balls before he joined. Then, as EVH’s writing was changing, he and VH put out cheesy pop metal tunes that were everywhere back then. Though more technical in some aspects, 5150 and 0U812 aren’t any better (or more catchy) than anything Poison or Dokken was doing back then. That’s why these bands (and many more like them of the time) often played on the same bill, or all together in some of the festivals that took place. Not trying to start anything with anyone here, that’s just my take on it.

    As far as the albums go, I’ll take VH2 as #1. It still sounds the freshest from the relaxed intro to ‘You’re No Good’ to ‘Outta Love Again’ being the type of simple, raw, kickass tune (where you can clearly hear all 4 members’ contributions) that VH would move away from over the years. Somehow Dave made a song like ‘Beautiful Girls’ work, and kept it from being cheesy. That wouldn’t have happened with Sammy imo. FW is next, then WACF and VH1 a tie. I won’t even consider listening to any of the others anymore-not even 1984. That’s not the VH that I love :)

  • RickieVanWhalen

    If you don’t think that Dirty Water Dogs is an absolutely mind blowing tune, YOU ARE DEAF.

  • http://none Dirty Duck

    Ok guys: we get it.
    Gary has a great set of pipes and is not a wuss…
    All that doesnt mean shit.
    He was NOT made for VH…period!

  • Pongo

    Wait until the new Extreme Live DVD from the HOB in Boston comes out in a month or so….he’ll see how much of a wuss Cherone is. Not a good match for VH, but a great front man, nonetheless!

  • Bobby

    I don’t personally have a problem with III, there was some interesting music on there. If you want to point fingers as to why it was a commercial failure I think you have to look at how it was made. Eddie pretty much did everything. Instead of just writing music, Eddie has become a control freak that has to have his finger in every aspect of the creation of VH music. Back when he let the people around him do their jobs, the songs took care of themselves. Apparently he even played bass on most of III. I don’t, its supposed to be a band.

  • VHIII_1998_

    Extreme have been covering some roth era van halen tunes, one of them being mean street.I’m not sure if they have done any van hagar covers but I can confirm Mean street and unchained have been in the set.

  • VHIII_1998_

    When I saw Van Halen during the VH3 tour It was packed and in the parking lot people were jamming to all era’s of VH and the band played all era’s of VH some all in all I thought it was a good show.

  • RickieVanWhalen

    Bobby – good point.

    Most of you should know that the approach to writing on VH3 was totally diffent. In this case, Ed took lyrics from Gary and wrote the music, all of it… melodies included. I hardly think the vocals were an after thought as someone said. In the past, EVH provided the tune and vocals were decided on my DLR or SH.

    VH3 is pretty amazing stuff, tonally. You have to listen some of it a few times to get it. I think Gary rocked and loved his singing. Sorry Karl!

  • Haywood

    Hey would ya know what? VH3 just confused the hell out of me…How about the Twister soundtrack? I never see anyone commenting on that…Not exactly VH, but dudes, I tell ya some very inventive and mesmerizing tracks in there by Eddie/Alex give it some props for what its worth! Smoke a bowl and put yer ‘phones on!!

  • VHIII_1998_

    It would be cool to see Ed use respect the wind on an album or live.awesome piece of music.

  • http://none Dirty Duck

    Ok….to be fair here…
    If you’re a guitar player I can honestly understand why VHIII means something. There was a vibe on that album that showed that ed was truly “searching” for something different….something fresh….as far as sound was concerned. There is some great playing on that album.
    But I’m not a guitar player (always wanted to be a fromtman)so to me the vocals did not match up.

    I remember seeing the video for “Without you” on MTV and gringing the whole time. I thought the song sucked.
    I remember eddie in that lame jesters hat (which I never understood)and all that ice! I gave it another listen and I felt the same. I was like: this aint VH! And I have NOTHING against gary cherone. Nothing. I think “III sides to every story” is a great album.

    He just wasnt made for VH.

  • Cam Winston

    Essential = All but those that follow…
    Good = Driver Down (Little Guitars makes up for the covers)
    Avoid = VH3 (Not Cherone’s fault & 2.5 songs are okay, but the CD is crap when compared to the rest of the catalog)

    Any Sammy fan who leaves off Fair Warning or Dave fan who leaves off F.U.C.K. are partisans akin to a White House spokesperson telling us how the respective President’s policies are so much better than his opponents’. Why such nonsense could make its way into a MUSIC discussion is beyond me, but….whatever.

    [any first release of a major rock band is going to be the 'best' because its new & fresh. Much like movies, the originals are generally better than the sequels because, surprise, it's something you've never heard before.]

  • http://bing therockmachine3

    the debut by roth is the best album they ever did fair warning is underrated 1984 is overrated and dated sounding in some spots but it was popular an i will admit has become a classic just not as good overall as its rep makes it. The debut by sammy 5150 is also a little dated in spots but to me its the best album he did with the band evh really could write a song and create memorable hooks i think they would have went that way with the songwriting even if roth was there, the rest of hagar was popular but there really was a slight down hill feel to each subsequent album although fuck was actually pretty consistent top to bottom balence had some good shit but was average for van halen and vhIII wasnt cherones fault nobody could have made that be a success it might have represented eddie stretching out an showing his range or whatever but it was boring the production was crap and produced no hits and even the cover art was low class and chintzy lookin for gods sake its van halen put some effort into it anyways vh is great an its easy for us to analyize and criticize but i still hope for a new album unlikely as it is

  • Jammy

    “Fair Warning” in the same category as “Diver Down”? “5150″ merely good? What happened to “Balance”?

    This reviewer has no idea what he is talking about! Bring in a real Van Halen fan!!!!

  • http://none Dirty Duck

    FUCK BALANCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    IT SUUUUUUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Without a doubt the WORST VH record!

    F.U.C.K is the hardest sammy ever rocked with VH period!

  • Eric

    Rank:

    1. Fair Warning (Smash Mouf Mutha Fuckin’ in yo’face shit)
    2. VH (Atomic Punk Ass Biootches)
    3. FUCK (Thrills, Chills and mutha fuckin’ Drills)
    4. VHII (Light ‘em UP!!!)
    5. 5150 (Best of Bofe Bioootches)
    6. WACF (Everybody want some o’ dis?)
    7. 1984 (Jump? How’z ’bout take a mutha fuckin’ dump)
    8. Balance (Love Dis, biootch)
    9. OU812 (I oughta smack you upside your muggin’ grape)
    10. Diver Down (Gay ass muuuh fuckuz)
    11. VHIII (HAHAHA)

    Now, we be waitin’ why dey be off suckin toes and tossin’ salads fo some mo’ shizznitz.

  • Awell2

    I absolutely love balance. That is tied with VH I as far as best albums from the band with fair warning being a close third. Fair warning and balance are opposites of the same coin for me. They are much darker than any other albums in their catalogue. The music sounds pissed off. Love those two.

    I’m a guitar player, and have listened to III a lot, and I don’t get it. Really think year to the day is an epic and fantastic song, but, to be honest, I don’t really dig that album. Gary was awesome live, especially with the Roth stuff, but I just can’t get into recorded stuff.

  • RR

    Dirty Water Dog is a great tune. Get with it brother.

  • http://none Dirty Duck

    Thanks snoop dog…..

  • http://www.myspace.com/timkarplus t1m

    The thing that makes me mad about OU812 is that the tunes weren’t all that bad…watching their ’89 Tokyo concert “Black and Blue” and “Mine all Mine” are pretty flippin’ sweet. It was just the album: the sound of it and the production of it. I feel similar about 5150, For Unlawful and Balance are much better in my opinion.

  • http://none Dirty Duck

    I never got that? Why did the production and sound get worse as the years went on for VH? I mean I would think it would be the other way around no?

  • arthur_bishop1972

    Yes, I would too Duck.

  • therockmachine3

    i have seen van halen with hagar (1995) on the balance tour and it was pretty good had some highpoints but eddie wasnt moving around at all kinda just stayin in one spot and it was note for note almost perfect ( he had hip surgery around that time so that explains why he was stationary) but i was disapointed in the fact that there were very few roth songs played sammy wouldnt sing em i know but still kinda a let down but weirdly enough sammy was the mvp of that particular show he did a tribute to jerry garcia who had recently died playing his song where eagles fly and he had alot of energy and he and michael anthony really seemed to be having fun i already talked about eddie who was still playin like a genius just not much energy but alex was goin thru the motions and i must say 15 minute drun solos get really boring! and the second time i saw vh was on the roth reunion tour i really was about 25 yrs late because all the elements were there and some of the magic was evident but the execution was routine and the show was just a generic lets just do it and get paid and move on to cleveland type of thing once again eddie was stationary and seemed shy and nervous roth moved around but his high over the shoulder leg kick now is a over the knee cap leg kick alex was the same consixtent and a non factor wolfgang was nonexistent and it seemed like they used michael anthony backing tracks on some sings particularly beautiful girls