<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eddie Van Halen Signature Wah Pedal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vhnd.com/2008/06/12/eddie-van-halen-signature-wah-pedal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vhnd.com/2008/06/12/eddie-van-halen-signature-wah-pedal/</link>
	<description>The Latest News &#38; Info about The Mighty Van Halen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 23:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Greggs</title>
		<link>http://www.vhnd.com/2008/06/12/eddie-van-halen-signature-wah-pedal/comment-page-1/#comment-6298</link>
		<dc:creator>John Greggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 05:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vhnd.com/?p=324#comment-6298</guid>
		<description>if I DON`T WER THE POT OUT MYSELF, THEN WHAT GOOD IS IT?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if I DON`T WER THE POT OUT MYSELF, THEN WHAT GOOD IS IT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rehash</title>
		<link>http://www.vhnd.com/2008/06/12/eddie-van-halen-signature-wah-pedal/comment-page-1/#comment-6295</link>
		<dc:creator>Rehash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 02:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vhnd.com/?p=324#comment-6295</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure if I buy the &quot;worn-in pot&quot; thing. If anything, wouldn&#039;t the wah not function as well as an unworn pot (i.e., wouldn&#039;t the wah sweep be wider and balanced)? I haven&#039;t heard the VH wah sound, so I can&#039;t really judge, but just the marketing of a worn-in pot for wah makes me skeptical. It&#039;s not the same as vintage items or aged wine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if I buy the &#8220;worn-in pot&#8221; thing. If anything, wouldn&#8217;t the wah not function as well as an unworn pot (i.e., wouldn&#8217;t the wah sweep be wider and balanced)? I haven&#8217;t heard the VH wah sound, so I can&#8217;t really judge, but just the marketing of a worn-in pot for wah makes me skeptical. It&#8217;s not the same as vintage items or aged wine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

